True = 0% full of shitNonetheless, one gets a consistent picture of who is reliable and who is not. Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich, Donald Trump, and Michele Bachmann are not looking good. I recalculated the truthfulness % of Obama and Romney based on the Politifact stats, above (true x 100%, mostly true x 75%, half true x 50%, mostly false x 25%): Obama's truthfulness came in at 53%; Romney's at 44%.
Mostly True = 25% full of shit
Half True = 50% full of shit
Mostly False = 75% full of shit
False = 100% full of shit
Pants On Fire = 200% full of shit
I then add all of their scores together and divide by the total number of rulings, easy as pie!
Friday, September 14, 2012
Ratings Based on Politifact Scores
Who's More Full of Shit? is a website that aggregates ratings from Politifact, a widely respected website of the Tampa Bay Times that rates the truthfullness of statements by politicians. The methodology of Who's More Full of Shit? is sort of goofy:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment